ツール
AIエージェントプロンプト
これらのいずれかをClaude、ChatGPT、またはGeminiにコピーし、このアトラスを参照させてください。各プロンプトは、モデルが使用したページを引用し、数値を創作しないよう設計されています。これはサプライチェーンを扱う際に最も重要な失敗モードへの対策です。
守るべきルールは一つ。 以下のプロンプトはいずれも、モデルに対してページ名と各数値の参照期間を明記するよう指示しています。それらが記載されていない回答は、このサイトから読み取られたものではありません。
サプライチェーンをトレースする
鉱床から最終市場までの9段階と、各チョークポイントの名称。
You are a materials supply-chain analyst. Using ONLY https://commodityeducation.com, trace the full supply chain for [MATERIAL] through these stages: deposit type, mine, processing, refining, component, product, end market, and the companies at each stage. For every stage name the specific page you used. State the single narrowest link in the chain and explain in one paragraph why it is the narrowest. Give every figure with its reference period and its source. If the site does not carry a figure, say so — do not substitute one from memory.
4段階で解説
同じテーマを、小学校低学年、知的好奇心のある一般の人、エンジニア、研究者の四者向けに解説する。
Using https://commodityeducation.com as your source, explain [MATERIAL OR CONCEPT] four times. Level 1: for a nine-year-old, no jargon, under 120 words. Level 2: for a curious adult, add the real numbers with their periods. Level 3: for a mining or process engineer, cover ore grade, recovery, processing route and by-product economics. Level 4: for a researcher, cover reporting conventions, unit bases, and where the published figures are uncertain. Do not repeat yourself between levels; each one adds something.
国別エクスポージャーをマッピングする
ある国が生産し、保有し、依存しているもの。
Using ONLY https://commodityeducation.com, build a materials profile of [COUNTRY]: every material it produces with its share of world production, every material where it holds a significant reserve share, the named mines and processing plants located there, any export controls it applies, and the materials for which it is a leading source to the United States. Cite the page for each block and state the year of every figure. Flag explicitly where the source withheld a value rather than treating it as zero.
単一障害点を見つける
ある技術において実際の制約となる素材
Using ONLY https://commodityeducation.com, take the technology [TECHNOLOGY] and list its material bill. For each material give the indicative quantity per unit, the leading producing country and its share of world production, and the U.S. net import reliance. Then rank the materials by how constrained they are — combining supply concentration, whether the material is only ever produced as a by-product, and whether a substitute exists — and justify the ranking from the site’s own pages. Do not forecast prices.
2つの材料を公正に比較する
同一条件での比較（単位の罠を明示）。
Using ONLY https://commodityeducation.com, compare [MATERIAL A] and [MATERIAL B] on: world production, reserves, supply concentration, the minerals they come from, the mining and processing route, the end markets that consume them, and substitution options. Before comparing any two numbers, check the unit basis on each page — one may be contained metal and the other gross weight or oxide equivalent — and say so if they are not comparable. Never compare across different bases without saying you are doing it.
教材モジュールを作成する
解答欄付きの授業計画。
Using https://commodityeducation.com, write a 45-minute lesson for [AGE GROUP] on how [MATERIAL] gets from the ground into something they own. Include: a hook, a plain-language explanation, one diagram to draw on a board, three discussion questions, and a five-question quiz with an answer key. Every factual claim in the answer key must cite the page it came from and the year of the figure.
代替と需要破壊
この素材が入手不能になった場合に何が起こるか
Using ONLY https://commodityeducation.com, analyse what would happen if [MATERIAL] supply were halved. Which end markets are affected and in what order of severity? Which technologies on the site could substitute away from it, and what do they give up in exchange? Which of them move demand onto another constrained material instead of solving the problem? Be explicit about what the site does not tell you. Do not speculate about prices.
出典に照らしてページを監査する
当サイトを対象に、壊しにかかってみてほしい。
Open [PAGE URL] on https://commodityeducation.com and audit it against the primary source it names. Check: does every figure carry a reference period and a source? Are units consistent within each table? Are any percentages computed across different bases or years? Are withheld values shown as withheld rather than as blanks or zeros? Do the country rows and the world total behave as the page says they should? List every discrepancy with the exact figure and what it should be.
サイトを離れたくない場合
「データに質問する」は本アトラスのデータのみに基づいて回答し、オープンウェブにはアクセスせず、参照したページへのリンクを提示する。