这是什么?
The second-most-common element in the Earth's crust — ordinary sand — purified until only one atom in a billion is something else.
为何重要?
Every chip and almost every solar panel starts as a single silicon crystal. The purification, not the raw material, is the hard part.
Where it is in the Earth
Silicon is the second most abundant element in the Earth's crust, yet it almost never occurs in pure metallic form. In nature it bonds immediately with oxygen, forming silicon dioxide (quartz) and a broad family of silicate minerals that make up the bulk of common rocks — granite, sandstone, quartzite, and many others. The sheer prevalence of silicon-bearing rock is not, on its own, what makes a deposit worth mining. What matters is finding quartz that is both physically concentrated and chemically clean enough to feed a smelter without excessive pre-treatment.
The most useful deposits are high-purity quartzite — metamorphic rock in which ancient sandy sediments were compressed and recrystallised by heat and pressure deep in the crust over hundreds of millions of years. That metamorphic process can flush out many impurities, leaving behind masses of nearly pure silicon dioxide. Major deposits of this kind are found in Norway, Brazil, and parts of North America and Australia. A separate and more abundant source is unconsolidated silica sand, formed when quartz-rich rocks weather and the grains accumulate in river beds, beaches, and dunes. Sand is cheaper to extract but typically carries more iron, aluminium, and other contaminants that must be removed before the material can be smelted into silicon metal.
The geography of silicon production therefore reflects two separate things: where clean quartz happens to be concentrated by geology, and where cheap electricity is available to run the energy-intensive smelting furnaces. A country can have excellent quartzite and still not smelt much silicon if power costs are high, or it can import ore and smelt it locally if electricity is cheap. Norway and Iceland, for instance, exploit abundant hydroelectric power. China's dominance reflects a combination of domestic quartz resources, coal-powered electricity, and decades of deliberate industrial scaling.
Getting it out
Silicon metal starts life as mined quartz or quartzite, and in almost every case the mine is an open pit. The rock sits at or near the surface in large, coherent masses, which makes underground working unnecessary and uneconomic. Quartzite is blasted with explosives, loaded onto haul trucks, and crushed at a primary crushing plant near the pit. Because quartz is the target mineral rather than a trace metal dispersed through host rock, the ore grades are high — the material mined is predominantly the useful mineral itself. There is relatively little of what miners call waste rock, the barren material that must be moved but contains nothing saleable.
The practical challenge is not extracting enough silicon dioxide but extracting it at sufficient purity. Even a quartzite body that looks uniform to the eye will contain veins and pockets of feldspar, mica, iron oxides, and other minerals. Mining therefore involves selective extraction — working those parts of the deposit that assay below certain thresholds for iron, aluminium, calcium, and other elements that would degrade the final metal. Ore that fails purity tests may be stockpiled separately or sold to lower-grade markets such as the construction aggregate or glass industries. This selectivity means the effective yield from a given volume of rock is lower than the raw abundance of quartz would suggest.
Silica sand operations follow a different pattern. The unconsolidated sand is dredged or scraped from the surface with minimal blasting, then washed and classified by particle size. Because the starting purity is lower than quartzite, sand operations typically invest more heavily in wet processing — scrubbing, magnetic separation, and flotation — before the material leaves the mine site. The result is a product still well short of silicon metal purity, requiring smelting to go further.
What pulls on it
Silicon has two largely separate demand streams that happen to start from the same element. The first is metallurgical: steel and aluminium producers use ferrosilicon and silicon metal as alloying agents to harden metals and remove dissolved oxygen, and the chemical industry uses silicon metal as the feedstock for silicone polymers and silicon tetrachloride. These markets are large, mature, and tied broadly to construction activity, automotive production, and industrial output. They do not require ultra-high purity and they absorb the bulk of the silicon produced globally by volume.
The second stream is the electronics and energy transition market, which demands polysilicon and, ultimately, single-crystal wafers. Solar photovoltaic manufacturing has become the dominant growth driver here. A crystalline silicon solar module requires between 2,500 and 4,000 kg of polysilicon per megawatt of generating capacity — a substantial physical quantity that scales directly with the rate of solar installation. Semiconductor demand, by contrast, uses far smaller quantities of silicon by weight (a single 300 mm wafer weighs roughly 125 grams, and the silicon content of finished chips is a small fraction of that), but the value embedded in each kilogram is vastly higher and the purity requirements are far more exacting.
For silicon demand to shift sharply downward in electronics, chip architectures would need to migrate away from silicon substrates entirely — something the industry has pursued incrementally with materials such as gallium nitride and silicon carbide for specific power applications, but not at a scale that threatens silicon's overall volume. In solar, a move away from crystalline silicon toward thin-film alternatives would reduce polysilicon demand, but crystalline silicon retains strong efficiency and cost advantages that have kept its market share dominant. The clearer upward pressure on demand comes from continued solar deployment, electric vehicle power electronics, and data-centre expansion, all of which draw on different parts of the silicon supply chain simultaneously.
其在岩石中的来源
所有含矿矿物 →实际承载以下内容的矿物: silicon. 只有其中某种物质的富集程度足以覆盖开采成本,矿床才能成为矿体。
生产主体
在地图上查看 →Ferrosilicon
Ferrosiliconthousand metric tons 2025 (估计值) 全球合计 5,000 thousand metric tons
USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 · USGS silicon figures are silicon CONTENT of ferrosilicon plus silicon metal, not polysilicon. · 来源 ↗
横向滚动表格以查看其余列。
| 国家/地区 | 产量 | 占全球份额 |
|---|---|---|
| China | 3,500 | 70.0% |
| Russia | 420.0 | 8.4% |
| Brazil | 170.0 | 3.4% |
| Norway | 150.0 | 3.0% |
| Other countries | 140.0 | 2.8% |
| Kazakhstan | 120.0 | 2.4% |
| Malaysia | 120.0 | 2.4% |
| Bhutan | 98.00 | 2.0% |
| Iceland | 72.00 | 1.4% |
| India | 59.00 | 1.2% |
| Spain | 40.00 | 0.8% |
| South Africa | 35.00 | 0.7% |
| Canada | 23.00 | 0.5% |
| France | 21.00 | 0.4% |
| United States | Withheld | — |
| Australia | Zero | — |
| Germany | Zero | — |
| 全球合计 | 5,000 | 100% |
Silicon metal
Silicon metalthousand metric tons 2025 (估计值) 全球合计 4,600 thousand metric tons
USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 · USGS silicon figures are silicon CONTENT of ferrosilicon plus silicon metal, not polysilicon. · 来源 ↗
横向滚动表格以查看其余列。
| 国家/地区 | 产量 | 占全球份额 |
|---|---|---|
| China | 4,000 | 87.0% |
| Brazil | 180.0 | 3.9% |
| Norway | 130.0 | 2.8% |
| France | 68.00 | 1.5% |
| Australia | 47.00 | 1.0% |
| Other countries | 46.00 | 1.0% |
| Russia | 35.00 | 0.8% |
| Canada | 34.00 | 0.7% |
| Iceland | 16.00 | 0.3% |
| Germany | 13.00 | 0.3% |
| South Africa | 10.00 | 0.2% |
| Kazakhstan | 7.00 | 0.2% |
| Spain | 4.00 | 0.1% |
| India | Zero | — |
| Malaysia | Zero | — |
| United States | Withheld | — |
| Bhutan | Zero | — |
| 全球合计 | 4,600 | 100% |
"未披露"表示美国地质调查局(USGS)为避免泄露单个企业数据而对该数字进行了保密处理——并不意味着数值为零。各国行数之和不一定等于世界合计,原因在于来源对每个数字单独进行四舍五入处理,且并不总是单独列出"其他国家/地区"一行。
价格
average, cents per pound of silicon: Silicon metal
年度平均值cents per pound
基准: average, cents per pound of silicon: Silicon metal. 年度平均值,来源: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 · 来源 ↗. 以下为参考年度均价,非实时市场报价。
average, cents per pound of silicon: Ferrosilicon, 75% silicon
年度平均值cents per pound
基准: average, cents per pound of silicon: Ferrosilicon, 75% silicon. 年度平均值,来源: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 · 来源 ↗. 以下为参考年度均价,非实时市场报价。
其加工与精炼地点
| 工厂 | 类型 | 阶段 | 国家/地区 | 角色 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Pyeongtaek Campus | 半导体晶圆厂 | 组件 | South Korea | 输入 |
| TSMC Fab 18, Tainan | 半导体晶圆厂 | 组件 | Taiwan | 输入 |
| Hemlock Semiconductor Polysilicon Plant | 化工厂 | 精炼 | United States | 输入 |
| Xinjiang & Inner Mongolia Polysilicon Cluster | 化工厂 | 精炼 | China | 输入 |
其用途
所有终端市场 →| 终端市场 | 其在彼处的用途 | 重要性 |
|---|---|---|
| Data Centres & AI | Processors, memory and power conversion | 定义 |
| Solar Power | The cell itself | 定义 |
| Semiconductors | The wafer | 定义 |
| Consumer Electronics | Every chip | 定义 |
| Robotics & Automation | Controllers and sensors | 定义 |
| Electric Vehicles | Power electronics and anode additive | 重要 |
| Power Grids | Grid-scale power electronics and HVDC valves | 重要 |
某项技术的需求用量
| 技术 | 数量 | 报价 | 基准 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crystalline Silicon Solar Module | 2,500–4,000 kg | per MW of capacity | Polysilicon in the wafers |
| Gallium Nitride Power Device | 痕量 | per device | Common substrate for GaN-on-Si |
| Leading-Edge Logic Chip | 0.12–0.15 kg | per 300 mm wafer | One 300 mm wafer weighs about 125 g |
Indicative range compiled from published technology studies and chemistry; verify against a manufacturer specification before use. 在物料计算器中按任意规模运行这些数据 →
跟踪其跨境全程
全部溯源记录 →这批材料实际经过的路线——每个国家、每位托管方,以及每个环节留下的内容。
A quarry in North Carolina to the chip in your phone The most valuable sand on Earth, and almost all of it comes from one small district.

