Vom Gestein zum Produkt, nachverfolgt
The Materials Atlas
Materialien Bergwerke & Lagerstätten Aufbereitung & Raffination Verbleibsrouten Lieferketten Unternehmen Länder Nachrichten
Materialien nach Regal Batteriematerialien Seltene-Erden-Elemente Kupfer & Elektro Halbleitermaterialien Nuklearmaterialien Luft- und Raumfahrt & Verteidigung Edelmetalle Stahl & Legierungsmetalle Industrieminerale Agrarmineralien Energierohstoffe Erzminerale Periodensystem
Nachfrage Endmärkte Technologien Materialrechner Karten Screener
Lernen & Werkzeuge LernenGlossar Die Daten befragenKI-Agenten Forschung & DatenAPI ★ Gespeichert
Über Über unsMethodik DatenquellenKontakt Haftungsausschluss
Leseoptionen
🧭 Geführte Ansicht Neu dabei – Erzgehalte, Konzentrat, Raffination, Nebenprodukte? Wir erläutern jeden Begriff beim Stöbern, in verständlicher Sprache. Dieselben Daten, mit integrierter Hilfe.
⚡ Expertenansicht Sie kennen die Branche. Nur die Daten – bereinigt, schnell und kompakt, ohne zusätzliche Erläuterungen. Dies ist die Standardansicht.
Thema
Oberflächensprache
Tiefe Materialseiten sind auf vier Ebenen verfasst. Wählen Sie eine auf einer beliebigen Materialseite aus — sie wird gespeichert.
★ Gespeichert Forschung & Daten
Thermal Coal

Energierohstoffe

Thermal Coal

Coal burned to make steam and therefore electricity — still, despite everything, one of the largest single sources of power in the world.

DRAGLINE (USED IN STRIP MINING) AT THE NAVAJO COAL MINE IN … · Lyntha Scott Eiler · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons

Was ist das?

Coal burned to make steam and therefore electricity — still, despite everything, one of the largest single sources of power in the world.

Warum ist das wichtig?

Coal power is also where a large share of the world's gypsum, fly ash and some germanium supply comes from as by-products.

Where it is in the Earth

Thermal coal is fossil carbon: the compressed, chemically altered remains of plant matter that accumulated in swampy lowland forests, mainly during the Carboniferous and Permian periods, though significant deposits formed in the Cretaceous and even the Eocene. When vegetation dies in an oxygen-poor, waterlogged environment, it does not fully decay. Instead it accumulates as peat. Over millions of years, as sediment piles on top, heat and pressure drive off water and volatile gases, gradually converting peat first to lignite (the softest, wettest coal), then to sub-bituminous coal, then to bituminous coal. The rank — the technical term for this degree of transformation — is the single most important geological variable, because rank determines how much energy a given tonne of coal can release when burned.

Thermal coal used in power stations is mostly bituminous or sub-bituminous. The highest-rank coal, anthracite, burns too slowly and commands a different market. The lowest-rank coals, lignites and brown coals, carry so much moisture that they are usually burned close to the mine rather than shipped internationally. The world's largest deposits sit in basins where ancient continental plates preserved thick sedimentary sequences: the Powder River Basin in the United States, the coalfields of the Bowen Basin in Queensland, the Kuznetsk Basin in Russia, and the vast reserves of Inner Mongolia in China. These are all places where the right combination of prolific ancient forests, a subsiding basin to accumulate sediment, and subsequent burial without excessive tectonic disruption happened to coincide.

The quality of coal within a single basin varies considerably. The seam thickness, the depth of burial, the amount of mineral ash mixed into the original plant material, and the concentration of sulfur — which entered the peat from seawater incursion or from pyrite in surrounding rock — all differ from place to place and even within a single seam. These variations matter enormously to buyers, which is why coal is not sold simply by the tonne but by energy content, ash content, sulfur content and moisture, each measured on agreed standard bases.

Getting it out

Most thermal coal is extracted by one of two broad methods, and the choice between them is almost entirely dictated by how deeply the seam is buried. Where coal seams lie close to the surface, typically under a cover of rock and soil that is thin relative to the thickness of coal beneath, the economics almost always favour open-cut mining, also called open-pit or strip mining. In open-cut operations, the overburden — the rock and earth sitting above the coal — is drilled, blasted and removed by enormous excavators and trucks before the coal is scooped out and loaded. The stripping ratio, expressed as the volume of overburden removed per tonne of coal recovered, is the central economic variable. A low stripping ratio means relatively little waste must move for each tonne produced; as a deposit deepens or thins, the ratio rises and the economics eventually tip toward underground methods or abandonment.

Where seams are deep, underground mining is used instead. The two main underground approaches are room-and-pillar mining, where coal is extracted in a grid pattern leaving pillars to support the roof, and longwall mining, where a long mechanised shearer cuts across a broad face and the roof behind it is allowed to collapse in a controlled way. Longwall mining recovers a much higher proportion of the coal in place, which is why it dominates in modern high-output underground mines. The trade-off is capital intensity: the equipment is expensive and the logistics of ventilation, gas drainage and personnel movement underground are complex.

One practical consequence of coal's geology is that open-cut mines in thick, shallow deposits can be among the highest-volume mining operations in the world by weight, moving material on a scale that few other commodities require. Underground mines tend to produce less tonnage but at lower waste ratios by volume, though they carry different costs in energy, labour and safety management. In either case the mined coal is rarely immediately saleable: it arrives at the surface as a mix of sizes and often with variable quality, and requires at least crushing and screening before transport.

What pulls on it

The overwhelming use of thermal coal is generating electricity. A coal-fired power station burns pulverised coal to boil water, drives a steam turbine with the resulting steam, and produces electricity. This single end use accounts for the great majority of all thermal coal consumed globally. A much smaller share goes to industrial steam raising — factories and processing facilities that need heat rather than electricity — and some lignite is used directly in district heating schemes in parts of Europe.

Demand is not uniform around the world. Countries in Asia, particularly China and India, account for the largest shares of consumption, partly because their electricity systems grew rapidly during decades when coal was the cheapest available fuel and partly because the alternatives — large-scale hydro, nuclear, domestic gas — were either geographically limited or politically complicated to build quickly. In contrast, demand in Western Europe and North America has fallen substantially over the past two decades, as natural gas became cheaper, as renewable electricity capacity expanded, and as regulatory pressure on carbon dioxide and air pollutants tightened. The direction of change in these regions is well established; the pace is the contested variable.

What would have to be true for global demand to fall sharply is not mysterious: power stations would need to be retired faster than new ones are built, or run at lower utilisation rates, and replacement generation would need to be available and affordable at scale. The complication is that the decision to retire a coal plant is made by individual governments and utilities facing very different electricity systems, grid reliability requirements, capital constraints and political circumstances. Demand is therefore the sum of many separate national trajectories, which is why aggregate global figures have remained large even as consumption in some regions has declined considerably.

Turning ore into product Ebene 3

Run-of-mine coal — the raw material as it comes off the face — contains not only coal but stone from the roof and floor, clay partings within the seam, and mineral impurities locked into the coal itself. The first processing step is size reduction and screening: jaw crushers and roll crushers break oversized material, and vibrating screens sort the product into size fractions. This is comminution in its simplest industrial form. For thermal coal the target size distribution is governed by what the destination power station's mills and burners can handle, not by any metallurgical requirement.

The more consequential step is coal preparation, also called beneficiation or washing. Washing exploits the density difference between pure coal, which is relatively light, and rock and mineral matter, which is denser. In a dense-medium vessel or cyclone, a suspension of finely ground magnetite in water is maintained at a controlled density; coal floats and is recovered, while rock and pyrite sink. The cleaned coal, called washed or prepared coal, has a lower ash content and usually a lower sulfur content than the raw feed, improving its energy content per tonne and reducing the pollutant load at the power station. The reject material, called tailings or coarse discard, must be managed and disposed of, and fine coal particles that cannot be economically recovered from the water circuit represent a real yield loss.

The economics of preparation hinge on the washability of the raw coal and the price premium a given market pays for lower ash. Some sub-bituminous coals have such naturally low ash that washing adds little value; others require it to be commercially acceptable at all. The washed product is then dewatered — by screens, centrifuges and sometimes thermal drying — because moisture is dead weight that reduces the effective energy content per tonne shipped. International trade specifications quote coal on a net-as-received (NAR) or air-dried basis, and the difference between these reporting bases is one reason published quality figures for nominally the same coal can appear inconsistent across sources.

Substitution and recycling Ebene 3

For electricity generation, the direct competitors to thermal coal are natural gas (burned in combined-cycle gas turbines), nuclear power, large hydroelectric schemes, wind, and solar photovoltaic. Each substitutes for coal in the sense that it can produce electricity, but the terms of substitution differ. Gas-fired generation can be built and dispatched relatively quickly and follows load flexibly, which makes it a practical near-term substitute in countries with gas supply. Wind and solar have no fuel cost and increasingly competitive capital costs, but they produce electricity only when the wind blows or the sun shines, so they require either complementary dispatchable generation, storage, or substantial grid interconnection to substitute fully for a baseload coal plant. Nuclear provides firm baseload power with no direct carbon emissions but has long construction lead times and high capital costs that limit how quickly it can displace coal in practice.

Within the thermal coal market itself, coal of different ranks and qualities partially substitute for one another at a price. A power station designed for high-calorific-value imported coal can often burn lower-quality material if the price difference is sufficient to compensate for higher ash handling costs, lower thermal efficiency and potentially higher emissions. This quality substitution is one reason the international coal market segments by energy content — the price series quoted on a 6,000 kcal/kg NAR basis reflects a different product and a different buyer pool than coal quoted at lower calorific values.

Recycling does not apply to thermal coal in the conventional sense: the carbon is oxidised during combustion and cannot be recovered as coal. What can be recovered are the by-products of combustion — fly ash, bottom ash and flue-gas desulfurisation gypsum. Fly ash, the fine particulate captured from flue gases, is used as a partial replacement for cement clinker in concrete, displacing a material whose own production is energy-intensive. This is not recycling of coal itself but it does extract economic value from what would otherwise be a waste stream, and it connects the thermal coal supply chain to the construction materials market in ways that are not obvious from the energy statistics alone.

Die Zahlen richtig lesen. Quoted per tonne at a stated energy content (e.g. 6,000 kcal/kg NAR); tonnes alone are meaningless. Steam coal by calorific value and sulfur.

Preis

Thermal coal, Australian price

JahresdurchschnittUS$ per tonne

1995 · 37.10 hoch 467.8 US$ per tonne 2026 · 140.4

Grundlage: IMF global price of coal — Australia thermal coal, 12,000 btu/lb, FOB Newcastle. Jahresdurchschnitte gemäß Veröffentlichung in FRED (IMF primary commodity prices) · Quelle ↗. Dies sind jährliche Referenzdurchschnittswerte, kein Live-Marktpreis.

In den Nachrichten

Mehr →

Pakistan Rejects Costly LNG Cargo as Blackout Risk Deepens

OilPrice.com02 Sep 2026

Asia Spot LNG Prices Hit 5-Month High as Hormuz Blockage Drags On

OilPrice.com01 Sep 2026

Gas Prices in Asia and Europe Jump as Qatar Extends LNG Force Majeure

OilPrice.com28 Aug 2026

DoE Begins Tests for Fracked Geothermal

OilPrice.com27 Aug 2026

Photovoltaic Windows Have Been Heating Water in a Bucharest Apartment for Two Years

CleanTechnica26 Aug 2026

Materialien

Alle Materialien Kritische Mineralien Seltene Erden Batteriematerialien Erzminerale Periodensystem Screener

Das Gestein

Bergwerke & Lagerstätten Aufbereitung & Raffination Länder Karten

Die Wirtschaft

Verbleibsrouten Lieferketten Endmärkte Technologien Unternehmen Materialrechner

Lernen

LernenGlossar Die Daten befragenKI-Agenten Forschung & DatenOffene API Nachrichten★ Gespeichert

Über uns

Über unsKontakt MethodikDatenquellen Redaktionelle Leitlinien DatenschutzrichtlinieNutzungsbedingungen Haftungsausschluss